« Photo Friday (Vol. LXI) [unknown ruins edition] | Main | More on perception and prejudice »

Sunday, April 02, 2006

Ibrahim's mirror

This is a very troubling post to write, and it will be doubly so if people leave comments based on their prejudices rather than their intellect. 

My intention is to demonstrate an example of how even relatively small disputes here in our region often have many layers of complexity.  Much as we would love them to be... things are rarely black and white.  As you will soon see, there is plenty of blame to go around.

There is a man who does some light yard work for us from time to time who, for the sake of this post, we'll call Ibrahim. 

Ibrahim lives with his wife and children in a neighboring Arab village, and like many people in his village he cultivates a few dunam of table grapes to supplement his meager income.  The land he farms is his by legal purchase and document, but he has had several recent disputes with his Jewish neighbors over where exactly his property ends.

In a recent show of solidarity with Israeli residents in my area, a visiting group of American Jews spent a few days enthusiastically planting trees out on the hills between our town and Ibrahim's.  Whether by accident or design they planted many of the trees on Ibrahim's land. 

It is Ibrahim's opinion that the trees were deliberately planted there to create facts on the ground that would eventually erode his claim to the land.  I've tried to assure him otherwise, but in my heart I'm not so sure.

Ibrahim is not a wealthy man and did not consider for a moment pursuing a solution to the problem through legal channels.  Instead, a few nights ago he went out and hooked his beat up old tractor up to the new trees and one-by-one, pulled them up by the roots.

Whether his action was expected or someone simply overheard the tractor and called the authorities is still not clear.  What is clear is that the police arrived and promptly arrested Ibrahim.  Not only that, they impounded his battered old tractor to boot. 

Ibrahim pleaded with them not to confiscate his tractor as it was essential to his ability to work his land and provide for his family... but the more animated and agitated he became the more adamant (some witnesses even say spiteful) the police commander was in assuring him that he had lost the tractor forever. 

Finally the police called in some IDF soldiers to help subdue Ibrahim and make sure there was no trouble from the large group of men from his village that had gathered on the scene upon hearing the noise and seeing the flashing police lights.

This story is terribly troubling to me from many standpoints. 

First of all, as much as people would like to say otherwise, the land in this area has been extensively surveyed and everyone living here has had ample opportunity to present documentation showing their claim to all parcels of land that are inhabited, cultivated or even idle. 

I'm not talking about the issue of 'occupation' or 'conquered land' at the moment, but simply about land that was legally purchased by, deeded to, or inherited by private individuals.  Of course, landmarks change... surveyors make mistakes... and documents are sometimes forged or altered.  But for the sake of the small picture, the people here know pretty much to the inch who owns what. 

Therefore, if a well-intentioned bunch of foreign Jews head out to plant trees, they almost certainly have a very good idea on whose land they are planting them.  After all... this kind of thing doesn't happen without some local guidance.

Secondly, although the laws in this part of the world may seem rather primitive or arcane to an outside observer, there are laws... and Ibrahim should have known better than to eschew proper channels in order to take the law into his own hands.  By taking the course of action he did it now appears to the courts (real, and of public opinion) that he was doing the land-grabbing and not the Jewish tourists (or the local Israelis who organized the tree-planting outing).

Lastly, with tensions always high in this area I have to question whether the intention of the Israelis who sent the Jewish tourists out to plant trees wasn't to use their combination of enthusiasm and ignorance to shave off a few precious meters of Ibrahim's land, knowing he was too poor to mount a meaningful legal challenge.

I've shared this with you today for several reasons. 

First, no matter who you are or where in the world you are reading this you likely aligned yourself with one side or the other based more on who you wanted to see as right rather than who had the stronger claim to actually being right.

Second, in almost every modern altercation over property in this part of the world, mistakes are made... poor judgment is exercised and blame can easily be assigned in more than one direction.

Lastly, if you honestly disagree with the previous two points I have some news for you:

What I have told you to this point is nearly all true.

The only minor details I have changed (which shouldn't matter to a fair and balanced consideration of this case) are the following:

a) Ibrahim is not my sometime gardener... he is the husband of my children's piano teacher.

b) Rather than being a Palestinian farmer from an Arab village who cultivates a few dunam of table grapes on legally purchased land... he is a Jewish farmer from a legal settlement who cultivates a few dunam of wine grapes on legally purchased land.

c) The contested tree-planting was not performed by a bunch of American Jewish tourists under the guidance of some local Israelis, but rather by a bunch of European tourists at the behest of local Palestinian leaders.

Everything else is exactly as I've described it... legal title to the land where the trees were planted... taking the law into his own hands... the confiscated battered old tractor... the IDF troops called, etc.

Of course you are free to continue reading the news as you always do, and to award the black or white hat to the players based on your current world view.  But I try very hard to read the news as if with a mirror.  Wherever and whenever possible I try to reverse the roles, religions, nationalities and motives of the players involved to see if my sympathies remain as firmly in place.

I am here to tell you that when I have looked at the news using such a mirror, neither Israeli nor Arab comes away wearing pure black or pure white. 

I didn't expect to change anyone's mind here... and this was actually not my intention.  I just want some of my readers to try using what I've come to think of as 'Ibrahim's mirror' for a few days to challenge their own objectivity.

219_58

Posted by David Bogner on April 2, 2006 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c581e53ef00e5503e664a8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ibrahim's mirror:

» Up is Down and Down is Up from An Unsealed Room
A great post with a twist on land grabs in the West Bank on Treppenwitz. Go read it.... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 2, 2006 6:25:55 PM

» Israeli farmer persecuted for uprooting trees ille from Tel-Chai Nation
Treppenwitz writes about an Israeli farmer who was arrested for uprooting trees that were planted on his grounds without permission by some European terror supporters. [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 3, 2006 12:01:31 AM

» Nathan's parable from Soccer Dad
Treppenwitz has an excellent post "Ibrahim's mirror." Reading it is a fascinating excercise in examining our prejudices. I see what my prejudices are, but I'm still not convinced that I'm wrong. As I reached the middle of the post, I... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 3, 2006 7:06:47 AM

» Look in the Mirror from SerandEz
I read Treppenwitz on a regular basis, but I'm still catching up on my reading - but David sent this via e-mail, so I checked it out first. It's brilliant. Read Ibrahim's Mirror. Check your biases at the door. [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 3, 2006 10:43:26 AM

» Haveil Havalim #64 is up and it's linkalicious from AbbaGav
And I'll pass on one more must read that isn't in Haveil Havalim, but probably will be next week: Treppenwitz's outstanding attempt at an objective look at the conflict over land ownership. Don't miss this one. [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 3, 2006 3:11:22 PM

» Ibrahim's mirror from Solomonia
Here's a must-read post by David Bogner: Ibrahim's mirror. Here's how it starts: This is a very troubling post to write, and it will be doubly so if people leave comments based on their prejudices rather than their intellect. My... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 3, 2006 11:04:41 PM

Comments

Sympathies on both sides. My take from other commenters is that I think in a different way from a lot of people (in a universal sense) - whenever I hear/read a narrative I tend to focus less on the actual words and more on the teller, what they are trying to get across, what might be going on in their head as they tell the story.
At first, I felt sympathy for "Ibrahim" and very surprised that you knew so much about his life and seemed to empathize with him - my previous impression having been that you did not have much contact with local Arabs. I then wondered if experience was changing your world view, the actual account did not surprise me very much. When you mentioned the farmer taking things into his own hands, assuming it was an Arab I wasn't surprised as my perception is that they feel that the law does not work for them.
With the twist - at first I thought the husband of the piano teacher was Arab and thought "Oh that is surprisingly open" - seems I have something in common with Lisa and PP. Then I thought "crap, there is an attempt at manipulation here" which kind of dominated my thinking from then on. I do feel sympathy for the Jewish farmer too, my main surprise is that he also feels that the law does not work for him (something we have touched on in conversation) to the degree that he does. I was also surprised at the response of the Army to him - so you got me there - definitely harsher than I would have expected.
I tend to not have any sympathy for anyone - either foreign Jewish activists or Pro-Palestinian activists - who get all tangled up in events on the ground, no matter how well meaning (although I would prefer to hear the last of the whole Rachel Corrie cult). I think they cause more trouble than good .

Thats my stream of conciousness take on things. Remember, I spent years in sales and plan on training as a therapist so I am constantly looking for what may or may not be going on beneath the words. Thats just me.

Posted by: Lisoosh | Apr 3, 2006 5:17:49 PM

Dave, I doubt he would have been arrested as Ibrahim but as Abraham he would. it is a strange country

Posted by: dave | Apr 3, 2006 8:10:08 PM

Another thought: What kind of legal system is it that arrests a guy for removing illegally planted trees from his own property?

Posted by: Scott | Apr 3, 2006 8:13:20 PM

Ah, curse my bleeding heart liberalness! Thank you very much for this exercise. It taught me quite a bit about myself.

K.

Posted by: Kate | Apr 3, 2006 8:32:59 PM

Great post. I was pretty surprised to find the police taking the Jewish side in the original formulation... now it asll makes sense... sort of.

Posted by: Ben | Apr 3, 2006 9:25:06 PM

Great post. Actually, I sided on Ibrahim's side from the beginning (and still do). I put myself in his position and I asked myself what I would have done had it been me. I would've uprooted them, too. If I went home from work today and saw that people planted something on my land that I did not want, I would remove it.

Posted by: Stacey | Apr 3, 2006 9:45:11 PM

Excellent post and well thought out. The "mirror" made his very thought-provoking. My first question is; is this an aberration or a common occurrence. Second; if the land was owned by Ibraham, I fail to see what law he broke (although I am totally unfamiliar with the laws over their). From the beginning, this appeared to be a "set up", to flame relationships between Jews and Arabs.

Posted by: American Crusader | Apr 4, 2006 12:40:47 AM

Sorry for the desecration of the English language in my post. there instead of their, and the mirror made this not his.

This should be a reminder for all poor spellers such as myself to proofread...lol

Posted by: American Crusader | Apr 4, 2006 12:44:17 AM

Great Post, David.
My sympathies are with Ibrahaim/Avraham, regardless of him being Arab or Jewish. I would have probably have done the same thing myself. It is true that going to the courts is probably the right thing to do, especially for Avraham (It is natural that being Jewish does gives one an advantage in a Jewish State), but even so the deep desire to get rid of something, some one else has planted on YOUR propery can override more rational considerations.

The people I dislike are those that got others to do their dirty work for them (i.e. plant the trees), and the zealous outsiders who did the planting & who knew little or nothing about what the situation really was, but thought they were striking a blow for their respective cause. It is idiots like the last that are, like those Irish-Americans who show their love for Ireland through helping the IRA tear the country apart, as Conor Cruise O'Brien noted more then 30 years ago.

Posted by: David All | Apr 4, 2006 12:49:51 AM

In fact worse than being impartial is constantly overcompensating the other way to counter a tendency to be biased. :-)

Heh. :) Amen.

Better to recognize our biases and live with them.

Posted by: Ezzie | Apr 4, 2006 10:14:49 AM

Artem... As I told Mobius. Fences have a place in the world and people have the right to build them. But the lack of a fence is not a provocation or an open invitation to encroachment or theft. Blaming the victim is never OK.

Tiburon... Thank you. Joe Settler and I are neighbors and I'm flattered he chose to share my writing.

Rahel... The police aren't able to make a determination on the spot who's land is who's. They get a complaint and act on it. Kacha ze.

PP... We can agree to disagree. But my point is there were endless places to plant a memorial grove of trees that would not have been seen as a provocation. The spot they chose was not such a place. I also think the spot was chosen specifically as a challenge and a provocation.

Elie... Thanks but by then I'm sure the field will be thick with worthy nominees.

Lisoosh... At least you are a universally sympathetic person. There are worse things to be. :-)

Dave... Just the opposite. The police are much quicker to arrest settlers these days because it is far easier to prosecute them (i.e. they have real names, property, assets, addresses, etc.).

Scott... One that is based not just on British, Turkish and Israeli law... but one that lacks a constitution.

Kate... That makes two of us. :-)

Ben... I've seen it go both ways. Really. In fact I think you'd find most Palestinians waiting at check points ready to argue with your assessment of preferential treatment.

Stacey... But then again you live in Texas and people don't go in for claim jumping 'round those parts. :-)

American Crusader... I'm not sure. As I said to other commenters, the police get a complaint and they act to intervene. They aren't judges or surveyors.

David All... There are far too many agitators on both sides who are more Israeli than the Israelis and more Palestinian than the Palestinians. A pox on all their houses I say. :-)

Ezzie... You said it.

Posted by: treppenwitz | Apr 4, 2006 1:21:30 PM

Creative and well done. This illustrates why it's so hard to be a good reporter.

Posted by: Alice | Apr 4, 2006 6:13:26 PM

Nice post.

Without taking sides here, I will say that it is not uncommon for Palestinians to plant as close as possible to settlement lands and borders. As I understand it, the Israel Supreme Court has ruled that settlements may not expand into land that is in use for any purpose. Of course, the meaning is that if Palestinians are already present and working the land, then the settlement has no right to usurp those lands. As a result, one of the tactics used by the Palestinians has been to attempt to plant "facts on the ground" as close to the settlements as they can.

At the end of the day, it's a fight over land that both sides covet.

My only real thoughts after reading the post was not who was to blame and why, but rather that most of the settlements are simply untenable. Ultimately, whether it is Ibrahim or Shmulik who is the victim, and whether it is Ibrahim or Shmulik who is "right," both of them, their families, their friends, their communities and their nations come out losers.

Posted by: TheMiddle | Apr 6, 2006 12:49:32 PM

Alice... That, and the fact that most reporters don't bother to do even the most basic historical research before reporting on conflicts that have deep historical and contextual roots.

The middle... I agree with most of what you've said except for the use of the word 'most' when talking about which settlements are untenable. Of course many are so remote and sparsely populated that it is silly to consider holding on to them in any sacrifice of land. However the way the current (and likely future) government is building the security fence is making otherwise vibrant communities that are quite near population centers almost indefensible. This creation of self-fulfilling prophecies is disturbing at best.

Posted by: treppenwitz | Apr 6, 2006 4:10:22 PM


It's not that I disagree with you that vibrant communities are going to be destroyed. I do. It hurts me greatly that we will leave them behind and it hurts me greatly that places that are so important to our history and traditions are going to be abandoned, probably without any future access, to the Palestinians.

It's just that if you look at the story you've told, after so many years of such stories - or worse, ones where people get killed or injured - my personal belief is that we are better off "disengaging." I want to put a fence between them and us because our interaction has failed in so many respects and Israeli society could be much healthier without the ethical and moral burden of the decisions the soldiers we put in the field have to make on a daily basis.

I am working on a post about this and will give you a shout when I publish it so that you can take a look. Again, I think this was a terrific post.

Posted by: TM | Apr 6, 2006 9:20:54 PM

Post a comment