« Never to be burned again | Main | Who's afraid of silly old ball bearings? »
Tuesday, August 08, 2006
Unseemly schadenfreude
I really shouldn't indulge in such unseemly schadenfreude while there is a war on. But I couldn't help chuckling this morning at seeing the Israeli far-left with its collective panties in a twist... all because nobody is paying any attention to their anti-war demonstrations. The best part was where Meretz MK Naomi Chazan had the gall to complain that "Criticism of the war has been contained and curtailed".
I'm sorry Naomi... were you profiled by the police on the way to your demonstrations? Were you stopped and forced to turn around? Were you arrested for taking part in your demonstration? Were you beaten and imprisoned without charge for expressing your opposition to a government policy you felt is wrong, immoral or even illegal?
No?
Then please do us all a favor and have the good grace to shut up and be just the tiniest bit embarrassed at your blatant hypocrisy.
Almost exactly a year ago the Israeli right was screaming to anyone who would listen that the media was quite obviously carrying water for the government and facilitating only the message that then PM Sharon wanted publicized. Any anti-disengagement voices were deliberately marginalized or ignored by the press, and demonstrations against the pull-out from Gaza were at best ignored... and at worst, physically thwarted.
However, it may surprise you to know that I agree 100% with MK Chazan and her political allies on two important points:
- Demonstrations should not be quashed or marginalized by either the media or the government.
- Political dissent is not only good for a healthy democracy, but essential!
I just find it a tad ironic that the very people who had absolutely no problem with the media marching in lock-step with the government during disengagement ('for the good of the country', mind you) are suddenly outraged when the pendulum returns and knocks them over like a bunch of bowling pins.
If citizens (but not soldiers, mind you!) want to demonstrate against the war, they should do so. Seriously... if that's how you honestly feel, get out there and scream in the streets! But if the media pretends such events aren't news and decides to return to a policy of carrying water for the government, you have to accept the blame for your own political and media marginalization.
I may be laughing on the inside at the far left's persistent but misguided faith in a negotiated solution with our sworn enemies even as rockets continue to fall on our cities and an entire generation of Israeli youth are in Lebanon risking their lives to try to stop the carnage on the home-front. But I absolutely share the left's outrage at the complete lack of a free, independent press in our small country.
Posted by David Bogner on August 8, 2006 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c581e53ef00e5503e66938833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Unseemly schadenfreude:
» MidEast War: 87 from Pajamas Media
August 8 2006 03:00 PDT War News (Blogs Opinion below) 03:58 PDT Taiwanese foreing minister admits meeting with Hezbollah leader Nasrallah during his visit to Lebanon last April: ""Hezbollah was a member of Lebanon's ruling coalition, so it is... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 8, 2006 2:07:47 PM
» Haveil havalim daily edition 08/09/2006 from Soccer Dad
Haveil Havalim is the weekly Jewish/Israel blogging carnival. The most recent edition is here. Since I originated the carnival, I've adopted the name for a daily edition that I will try to produce during the war against Hezbollah, Mondays through Thurs... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 9, 2006 2:42:10 PM
Comments
Did you happen to read this yesterday:
http://news.yahoo.com/comics/060807/cx_dilbert_umedia/20060708
Posted by: Dave (Balashon) | Aug 8, 2006 10:04:33 AM
A look at the future
Tactics, Strategy, Grand Strategy
The coming fall of the Syrian regime at: Syria Has a Problem. Its days are numbered. Sixty to ninety days. Possibly less.
Posted by: M. Simon | Aug 8, 2006 10:16:11 AM
Dave... No, I've been a little behind with my comic reading, but thanks. :-)
M. Simon... I have no problem with people posting links -even self-promoting links - so long as there is some connection to the post on which the comment appears.
Posted by: treppenwitz | Aug 8, 2006 10:28:17 AM
Just waiting for the KESHEV group to put out another of their silly reports on the media's right-wing anti-left-wing bias. My observation is that all their demos got coverage, most, verbal reports and several with pictures, some even live. The first 2 weeks of reporting were characterized by anti-war commentary (Allon Ben-David, Amnon Avramovitz), less-than-tepid-support (Nahman Shai), pompous "watch-out-for-the-Lebanese-muck" (Haim Yavin) and other assorted non-patriotic mouthings. It wasn't overwhelming but Naomi and her comrades are a bunch of fools.
Posted by: Yisrael Medad | Aug 8, 2006 12:49:24 PM
Joseph Goebbels would be proud of the way the media have carried on.
Posted by: Dot Co Dot Il | Aug 8, 2006 1:01:37 PM
Excellent post that shows true moral clarity. I can see them now them protesting as rockets fall ...how ridiculous...
Posted by: Jewish Blogmeister | Aug 8, 2006 3:30:06 PM
so when would a pendulum ever knock down blowling pins...?
Posted by: Tonny | Aug 8, 2006 3:30:53 PM
Sometimes I wonder whether some of those "protesters" actually believe what they are saying. I think they are being disingenuous, and statements such as above are just a step to score political points, rather than an honest fight for justice.
Posted by: Irina | Aug 8, 2006 10:13:53 PM
Oh please, they aren't getting enough coverage?
Forget that they are only pulling out at best a few thousand protesters compared to the Right's few hundred thousand protesters... They simply aren't going to where the reporters are.
They need to hold their protests in Kiryat Shmoneh, or Ma'alot and then they'll get bombed with press coverage.
Posted by: Joe Settler | Aug 8, 2006 11:02:59 PM
You know, the last syllable in schadenfreude is "duh". There's probably some significance there, but I'll have to puzzle on it a bit.
Posted by: Bob | Aug 9, 2006 12:06:21 AM
OR
Perhaps it's protecting the Israeli police who have beaten demostrators repeatedly.
Posted by: Sean | Aug 9, 2006 2:18:45 AM
There was one very juicy little bit a few weeks ago when a few women went out to the corners on Kfar Saba to protest the war. A short Ynet article quoted a woman as saying that it (paraphrasing here) "was hard protesting when people make u-turns in order to come back and spit on me...".
Posted by: westbankmama | Aug 9, 2006 7:43:39 AM
'duh' That's rich.
'u-tuning to come back and spit on me.' LOL. Heartening
I know. I'm a whackjob. But I really think we are at a great turning point in the world. Either the West wakes up and smells the coffee real soon or ... this really is the beginning of 'Jacob's Troubles' and ... Here We Go!
It kinda hangs on just how crazy ARE the Iranian mullahs and are we willing to pull the trigger. I mean really. Do we still have the stuff our fathers and grandfathers had?
I know, I know, they hemmed and hawed and the preachers of isolationism held sway for many years but finally our forefathers stood up and put everything on the line. Maybe we will too. Eventually.
My prayer is that my nation (US) stays on the right side. I sent a letter to Bush right afer his ellection in 2000 telling him it was all comming down in his term and hoping he would buck up and come through like Churchill (yes and even that commie Roosevelt). I don't know how he keeps breathing with half our population acting like quizling twerps.
Today, I site Leiberman's defeat as evidence the US is in truly dangerous waters.
Posted by: Scott | Aug 9, 2006 11:25:45 PM
Unseemely schadenfreude?
There's a brocho for this....
Please recite the Shlosha Neenerim.
Posted by: The Back of the Hill | Aug 10, 2006 12:43:15 AM
Unseemely schadenfreude?
There's a brocho for this....
Please recite the Shlosha Neenerim.
Posted by: The Back of the Hill | Aug 10, 2006 12:43:47 AM
Yisrael Medad... We dare not ignore fools... they tend to be the most dangerous ones.
Dot Co Dot Il... That might be going a bit over the top, don't you think? I'm always wary of invoking Godwins Law , but you should be careful about the gratuitous use of Nazi comparisons.
Jewish Blogmiester... Yet I will defend to the death their right to be silly.
Tonny... I borrowed this image of an exhibit I once saw where a pendulum had been set up and was swinging back and forth, occasionally knocking over bowling pins. Go figure.
Irina... Naturally some people in every protest have their own agendas.
Joe Settler... now there's an idea. :-)
Bob... You might be onto something there... :-)
Sean... The press has no stake in protecting individual bad actors. The government on the other hand...
Westbankmama... I don't know about spitting, but I sure would have had a few words of wisdom to share.
Scott... Admitting you have a problem is the first step. :-)
Back of the Hill... Amen.
Posted by: treppenwitz | Aug 10, 2006 11:20:15 PM
I'm with Scott. The US needs to remain steadfast in its support of Israel. Not one step bacward. I support sending whatever aid Israel may need, or request, but simply providing moral and political support will still many of the voices of surrender in the world.
Posted by: benning | Aug 11, 2006 3:22:47 AM
Speaking of our American forefathers, I believe it was Thomas Jefferson who encountered a people in our early days. They kept shooting at our ships, trying to sink them. Jefferson asked them the reason behind their behavior. We were a new country, had nothing against them - why were they trying to kill us?
Answer given (paraphrased): You are infidels, and we kill any who are not true Muslims.
250 years later, nothing has changed... except our willful blindness, which will be the end of us unless we wake up from our self-imposed and deliberate stupor.
Posted by: Talya | Aug 16, 2006 7:38:21 AM












